<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lowmag.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowmag.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowmag.net</link>
	<description>Culture, design, simplifying life.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Eggs</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/eggs/580/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/eggs/580/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eggs contain 72% RDA of cholesterol, and are very high in fat. I don&#8217;t think I ever read the actual label inside of a carton until yesterday. The easy alternative is something like egg beaters, but a carton of that isn&#8217;t cheap. It&#8217;s also got a half dozen other ingredients and is pasteurized, which seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eggs contain 72% RDA of cholesterol, and are very high in fat. I don&#8217;t think I ever read the actual label inside of a carton until yesterday. The easy alternative is something like egg beaters, but a carton of that isn&#8217;t cheap. It&#8217;s also got a half dozen other ingredients and is pasteurized, which seems excessive.</p>
<p>The best solution is to get an egg separator. Instead of paying about $4 for a carton of engineered egg whites, pay like $2 for a separator like the one that comes with OXO measuring cups. Eggs are $0.99/half dozen.</p>
<div id="attachment_582" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 505px"><img src="http://lowmag.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/oxomeasuringcups.jpg" alt="The egg separator is in the front" title="Oxo Measuring cups" width="495" height="371" class="size-full wp-image-582" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The egg separator is in the front</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/eggs/580/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/update/578/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/update/578/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought 80-100 was a hypo. Hah! try 49 the other day. Scary stuff. Cramming some food down while shaking and sweating is not fun. Real time glucose monitoring would be nice.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 80-100 was a hypo. Hah! try 49 the other day. Scary stuff. Cramming some food down while shaking and sweating is not fun. Real time glucose monitoring would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/update/578/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controlling blood sugar</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/controlling-blood-sugar/575/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/controlling-blood-sugar/575/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vegetarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is harder than it looks.
I end up &#8216;hypo&#8217; in the 89-100 range at times, and I always have something handy to eat to bring that back up, but most of my measurements of plasma glucose are around 90-110, with the occasional post-meal 120 or so. I&#8217;m keeping it in a pretty narrow target, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is harder than it looks.</p>
<p>I end up &#8216;hypo&#8217; in the 89-100 range at times, and I always have something handy to eat to bring that back up, but most of my measurements of plasma glucose are around 90-110, with the occasional post-meal 120 or so. I&#8217;m keeping it in a pretty narrow target, and I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if I&#8217;ll need something like a CGMS or Insulin pump to maintain comfortably the fluctuations throughout the day.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m eating less carbohydrates, and luckily there&#8217;s a lot of great <em>natural</em> low-carb food out there. I use meat substitutes for protein and fat content, and I generally have some fresh vegetables on-hand at home for quick steaming. In order to avoid periphery nervous and vascular complications, I&#8217;m trying to reduce my use of things like cheeses and other polysaturated fats. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m taking a trip this weekend that I know will interrupt my schedule greatly, but I&#8217;m going to try and stick with my plan and eat roughly the same stuff where I can. I have all of my gear ready to go and will be able to maintain clinical discipline during the trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/controlling-blood-sugar/575/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Type 1</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/type-1/573/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/type-1/573/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out I&#8217;m a type 1 diabetic, and the onset was rather sudden. I went to the doctor a few weeks ago complaining of the typical signs of diabetes, especially weight loss. We did some labs and they came back with abnormally high glucose levels.
I&#8217;ve learned a lot of things in the last few days. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out I&#8217;m a type 1 diabetic, and the onset was rather sudden. I went to the doctor a few weeks ago complaining of the typical signs of diabetes, especially weight loss. We did some labs and they came back with abnormally high glucose levels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned a lot of things in the last few days. Mainly, what I&#8217;ve been feeling in my head and in my bones and to my very core was wrong. I&#8217;m now to take a drug that&#8217;s supposed to kick my pancreas in the ass and tell it to try harder.</p>
<p>I also have to limit my carbohydrates to 45-60mg per meal. That&#8217;s going to be rough to pull off, but I think I can do it. I also have to eat more protein, which may have been severely lacking in my diet in some ways.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll manage, I&#8217;ll carry on, and I feel very supported by friends and family. Thank you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/type-1/573/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filters</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/filters/571/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/filters/571/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past month or so, I sold my EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM and my EF 24-70 f/2.8 L USM lenses. I&#8217;m mainly happy with the EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM lens, and I am currently listing my 50mm and 35mm &#8220;regular&#8221; primes on Craigslist for sale. Eventually, it&#8217;ll just be me and my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past month or so, I sold my EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM and my EF 24-70 f/2.8 L USM lenses. I&#8217;m mainly happy with the EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM lens, and I am currently listing my 50mm and 35mm &#8220;regular&#8221; primes on Craigslist for sale. Eventually, it&#8217;ll just be me and my 50L.</p>
<p>I ordered a Singh-Ray <a href="http://www.singh-ray.com/varind.html">Vari-nd</a> so I can slow down time and be a bit abstract. It&#8217;s very difficult to shoot certain scenes during the day, and the ability to add an extra few stops to the exposure will help me lengthen certain shots, and do stuff like turn lakes into glass in my photos.</p>
<p>On another filters subject: <a href="http://www.filters-now.com/">Filters NOW</a> has pretty much the best price for home air filters as I could calculate. My method was to go to the <a href="http://www.filtrete.com">filtrete</a> site and look at all the linked vendors. I figured shipping costs into the price per filter, since I&#8217;d normally pick them up from the store.</p>
<p>I spent about an hour going over the prices for a 16&#215;20x1 and 10&#215;20x1 filters and found this site has the best prices overall. I ordered a years supply of filtrete red filters, and I&#8217;ll be budgeting about 19 dollars a month to savings for next year&#8217;s buy. Buying them all at once saved me quite a bit versus Lowe&#8217;s prices. It&#8217;s about $70 in savings for buying them in large quantities.</p>
<p>I could save a lot by buying $3 fibreglass filters, but filtrete filters really do cut down on the dusting I have to do around the house.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also arranging to replace the UV anti-microbial lamp in my furnace. That&#8217;ll be about $70, with shipping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/filters/571/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>twitter</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/twitter/561/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/twitter/561/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My twitter feed, updated far more often than lowmag.net
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/lowmagnet">My twitter feed</a>, updated far more often than lowmag.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/twitter/561/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(SP?)</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/sp/560/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/sp/560/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know what I hate? On the Internet someone types a word on a message board then puts &#8220;(sp?)&#8221; after it.
UM HELLO YOU&#8217;RE ON THE INTERNET LOOK IT UP MORON
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I hate? On the Internet someone types a word on a message board then puts &#8220;(sp?)&#8221; after it.</p>
<p>UM HELLO YOU&#8217;RE ON THE INTERNET LOOK IT UP MORON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/sp/560/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In bad faith</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/in-bad-faith/559/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/in-bad-faith/559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[argumentation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[arrogance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fallacies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[high-horse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[moralists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this article on saving advice about sex as a way to save money. I don&#8217;t love it for the article itself, but for one comment below the article, written by &#8220;faith&#8221;:
Anyone that has no moral compass and would sleep with a prostitute should never be allowed to give advice to others. It is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this article on saving advice <a href="http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2008/05/29/102142_financial-advice-from-a-call-girl.html">about sex as a way to save money</a>. I don&#8217;t love it for the article itself, but for one comment below the article, written by &#8220;faith&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>Anyone that has no moral compass and would sleep with a prostitute should never be allowed to give advice to others. It is disgusting that you are allowed to write for this blog.</p>
<p>Sex is not a way to save money. It is a way for a good Christian couple to raise a family. This is the worst financial article I have ever read.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are several fallacies here:<br />
<span id="more-559"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Thinking that to have sex with a prostitute means you have no moral compass. Having sex with a stranger for money is only bizarre in the USA. It&#8217;s not immoral, nor is it amoral. It doesn&#8217;t increase suffering, and it is both a consensual act and a business transaction.</li>
<li>It doesn&#8217;t make someone&#8217;s advice invalid on any subject.  Being someone who doesn&#8217;t know about a subject (like say, morality) makes for bad advice.</li>
<li>Because one person doesn&#8217;t like it doesn&#8217;t mean that a person should never give advice. A lot of people think this is a valid form of argument. You can&#8217;t state an opinion forcefully and have it magically become fact. That&#8217;s not how things work.</li>
<li>It is not disgusting that this person is allowed to write for the blog. This again is opinion stated as fact, another thing I can&#8217;t stand from this segment of the population.</li>
<li>The author pointed out the ways that sex has saved money for him. To say it doesn&#8217;t save money is a flat-out contradiction of this. Of course, paying for sex doesn&#8217;t save money, but this isn&#8217;t what he&#8217;s talking about.</li>
<li>Sex is not only for Christians. It&#8217;s for people of all faiths or lack of faith.</li>
<li>Sex is not a tool used only to start a family. It is both useful for reproduction and recreation. Again, stating opinion as some sort of fact.</li>
<li>The worst advice I can imagine would be something like: Buy contractualized debt obligations. Not this.</li>
</ol>
<p>Yet another example of one culture thinking it&#8217;s the only culture and training people to spark moral outrage at the slightest offense. It&#8217;s embarrassing that we have to see this sort of thing in the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/in-bad-faith/559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best 40 bucks I ever spent</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/40-bucks/558/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/40-bucks/558/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I got the paperwork in for the refinance and crunched the numbers with my $40 calculator, and found that I would be best served by NOT refinancing my mortgage. 
My plan was to be out in 10 years from my loan, and I can better do that with my current terms while adding little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I got the paperwork in for the refinance and crunched the numbers with my $40 calculator, and found that I would be best served by NOT refinancing my mortgage. </p>
<p>My plan was to be out in 10 years from my loan, and I can better do that with my current terms while adding little to no stress on my bank accounts. Plus, I&#8217;m not forced to spend $5,000 in closing costs, or $200 a month in mandatory payments.</p>
<p>Sure, I&#8217;m out the $320 in rate &#8220;lock-in&#8221; fees, but I found that I have 3 accounts hurting my credit report in the process ($35 of those fees) and that I should close them. I can&#8217;t recover the lock-in fee, unfortunately. Still, it beats falling behind $5,000 in principal.</p>
<p>Let this be a note to everyone considering refinancing: do the math before accepting a lock-in. Do not trust your broker or bank &#8212; they do not have your best interests in mind.</p>
<p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pTKkxONrJd-N2VUfxixpvUw">The Math</a>, for those who are curious. I used the PMT function to find the payment for each situation, and multiplied it out by the terms of the loan. If I continue in my pre-payment plan, I will be out in 8-10 years, depending upon my aggression toward the goal. At that point, my expenses will drop by about $1,200/mo, and I&#8217;ll be mostly free of needing to work to live. Taxes and HOA fees not-withstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/40-bucks/558/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP 12c</title>
		<link>http://lowmag.net/hp-12c/557/</link>
		<comments>http://lowmag.net/hp-12c/557/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lowmagnet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowmag.net/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pure nerdcore:

HP 12c photo from The HP Museum.

Calculating re-finance is fairly easy. Given the following:
PV = $100,000
i = 6.25% APR
n = 30 years
First, solve for payment:
100000[PV]6.25[g][12??]30[12x][PMT] = -615.72/month
Say the homeowner wanted to re-finance after 5 years? First, clear number of periods (n) and calculate 60 months of amortization:
0[n]60[f][AMORT] = -30,280.21 (interest), and -6,662.99 (principal), found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure nerdcore:<br />
<a href="http://www.hpmuseum.org/hp12c.htm" title="hp12c at the hp museum"><img src='http://lowmag.net/assets/2008/12c.jpg' alt='Hewlett-Packard 12c Financial Calculator' class='alignnone' /></a><br />
<caption>HP 12c photo from <a href="http://hpmuseum.org/" title="The HP Museum">The HP Museum</a>.</caption>
<p><span id="more-557"></span><br />
Calculating re-finance is fairly easy. Given the following:</p>
<p>PV = $100,000<br />
i = 6.25% APR<br />
n = 30 years</p>
<p>First, solve for payment:</p>
<p>100000[PV]6.25[g][12??]30[12x][PMT] = -615.72/month</p>
<p>Say the homeowner wanted to re-finance after 5 years? First, clear number of periods (n) and calculate 60 months of amortization:</p>
<p>0[n]60[f][AMORT] = -30,280.21 (interest), and -6,662.99 (principal), found by hitting swap x/y key, </p>
<p>They find a loan at 5.5% over 15 years. Now we want to enter our refi data:</p>
<p>PV = $93.337.01 (found using [RCL][PV], but it&#8217;s already stored in the calculator, so we won&#8217;t be entering it below)<br />
i = 5.5% APR<br />
n = 15 years</p>
<p>15[g][12x]5.5[g][12??][PMT] = -762.64/month</p>
<p>OMG, a higher payment! But what does that do to the remaining payments? Let&#8217;s re-amortize the remainder of the loan to figure out what the rest of this will cost us:</p>
<p>0[n]180[f][AMORT] = -43,938.57 (interest), and -93.336.63 (principal) </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, you can always balloon that 38 cents, right? <del datetime="2008-05-23T01:20:57+00:00">Look what the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_value_of_money" title="Wikipedia article on the time value of money, or TVM">time value of money</a> does here: the first five years cost the homeowner -30,280.21 in interest over the first five years., the next 15 cost only 13,707.36 more than the first 5 years in interest.</del> Of course, it turns out that if I just double my current interest payment, I can pay off the home in 10 years (the above was a hypothetical abstraction of my current situation) for about 30/mo less than the refinance would cost with origination and other fees involved, all without modifying my savings plan. Go figure.</p>
<p>Of course, you could solve for n based on a monthly pre-payment, to see where an extra 200 bucks a month takes the length of the new mortgage&#8230; or you can see what paying that money to a higher interest investment does for you&#8230; or&#8230; Ahem. Best $40 bucks ever (bought it used, in perfect condition).</p>
<p>Also, in the above example,  I&#8217;m ignoring things like closing fees, up front fees, etc that may be rolled into the refinance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lowmag.net/hp-12c/557/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
